In an era of widespread digitization, services offering quick access to medical care have become an extremely attractive alternative to traditional clinics, where you often have to spend many hours only to find out that the doctor is no longer accepting patients.
The digital illusion of medical support
However, the platforms Receptomat.pl and l4.pl, managed by Rapiomed Group, have come under the scrutiny of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection. The UOKiK president has filed official charges of violating collective consumer interests against the company.
The main issue of the dispute concerns the fundamental way services are provided. The entrepreneur lured customers with promises in aggressive advertising and contract templates that turned out to be fiction for many. Patients were assured of a “telephone contact with a doctor” or a professional “medical consultation.”
The reality verified by officials turned out to be much harsher. In many cases the entire procedure was limited to a unilateral, automated analysis of a medical form, with no involvement of a medical voice.
See also: Auction house employees raised art prices themselves. UOKiK revealed unfair practices
Money upfront, coupons for consolation
The number of complaints received by the Office and the avalanche of negative online reviews clearly show that the platform’s business model severely tested the patience of desperate patients. Consumers massively reported an absolute lack of contact after paying for the service. They expected a promised conversation, while their requests were processed quietly, based on dry survey data.
The biggest outrage, however, was caused by financial issues and technical traps. The services charged upfront fees for the mere readiness to issue an e-prescription or issue an L4 leave. When the system or doctor refused to provide the service, patients could not expect a refund.
Instead of real funds, the company offered them discount coupons for future visits, forcing them to use the platform again. To make matters worse, complaint communication was hindered. The chat implemented in the apps was designed to maximize restrictions on free speech. Instead of describing their problem, users were forced to mechanically click simple answers “yes” or “no.”
See also: Dino shares at a 28% discount. UOKiK strikes at the giant! Working conditions in the network under scrutiny
Marketing clock vs. regulatory calendar
Another failure of Rapiomed Group turned out to be the glaring mismatch between marketing promises and official documents. On the websites and FAQ sections, the services promised rapid action. Patients saw messages about application processing in “up to 120 minutes (usually about 5 minutes)” or “up to 240 minutes.” In difficult health situations every minute matters, so these slogans acted like a magnet.
However, when officials looked at the official regulations, they found clauses guaranteeing the company deadlines of up to 48 hours. Moreover, the mobile apps repeatedly used the generic phrase “as soon as possible,” without specifying how that time is calculated. This juggling of promises is a classic example of misleading consumers to maximize conversion.
The legal consequences could be decisive. If the Office’s charges are ultimately confirmed, the UOKiK president will issue an order for the immediate cessation of these practices. But that’s not all. The operator may be subject to a gigantic fine of up to 10% of the company’s annual turnover.
For a company operating in the e-health sector, such a powerful financial blow could drastically slow further technological development and destroy investor trust. Digitization of medical services must be based on transparency, not on illusory promises without backing.
See also: The conspiracy of carriers and the network giant led to pathology in the labor market? UOKiK stepped in with control
Source: UOKiK
