Let’s have a quick look at the main factors determining the ECB’s decision at the 4 May meeting:
Inflation developments
Headline inflation in the eurozone has started to come down but almost exclusively due to energy price base effects. Core inflation remains stubbornly high and has even increased recently. Back at the March meeting, the ECB discussed whether core inflation was already at a turning point but couldn’t identify any hard evidence. At the same time, there were “a number of members seeing risks as tilted to the upside over the entire horizon”, adding doubt to the staff projections of inflation converging to 2% in 2025. ECB Executive Board member Isabel Schnabel recently hinted in an interview with Politico that even reaching the peak in core inflation was not necessarily a sufficient condition to alter course.
More generally speaking, the ECB’s main concern is that inflation has morphed from a supply-side issue to a demand-side issue. This change in the nature of inflation is still the most convincing argument for more rate hikes.
Given that interest rates and market prices are almost back to where they were prior to the banking turmoil, the March staff projections are currently probably more accurate than they were during the March ECB meeting. There is, however, one striking element: while the ECB expects the eurozone economy to return to its potential growth rate at the start of 2024, inflation will continue to come down until 2025. We doubt that this combination is feasible, but think that either inflation will remain stickier if the ECB’s growth forecast is correct or that growth will have to be weaker to get inflation back to target.
Banking turmoil
The minutes of the March meeting confirmed the message sent at the March press conference: the banking sector in the eurozone is resilient, with strong capital and liquidity positions. The ECB was confident that announced liquidity measures and the general resilience of the banking sector would “alleviate the current market tensions”. An interesting point was made, namely that “the transmission of monetary policy impulses was likely to be stronger at times of market stress than in calmer times”.
It wasn't a problem in March and it will not be a problem in May. The ECB will only focus on the impact of the recent turmoil on lending and activity.
Transmission of monetary policy tightening so far
The minutes revealed the first discussion on lags of the transmission of monetary policy, leading to a broader debate in two weeks on how far rates should still be hiked. There seems to be a growing divergence between ECB members favouring the view that “in the past, the effect of monetary policy had been continually overestimated, which might happen again”, while others argued that there was a risk “that the impact of monetary policy tightening was being underestimated”. This growing split was also illustrated by the fact that some ECB members preferred to pause the rate hike cycle at the March meeting, according to the minutes.
Read next: Australia: March inflation falls further| FXMAG.COM
Still, the narrative in official comments has now finally convincingly shifted to a meeting-by-meeting approach. Next Tuesday – when eurozone inflation, credit growth and the results of the last Bank Lending Survey are released – will be a crucial day for assessing the current state of play of how much of the tightening so far, and the latest banking turmoil, are already affecting the real economy.
|