The implications for SEK are negative
In spite of all that, we don’t think the Riksbank’s strategy has fundamentally changed. The April meeting minutes didn’t show any significant divergence in views on how to tackle inflation. And that means that another 25bp rate hike will likely be delivered as promised – we think probably in June – and that might be followed by more should the data argue for it.
What has changed, however, are the currency implications. New Governor Eric Thedeen has been resolutely hawkish and explicit about needing to support SEK, with some relative success when comparing the krona’s performance against other pro-cyclical peers.
But the April meeting was a turning point for the krona, as we argued at the time. The signals contained within the interest rate projection, the unexpected division within the board, and the subsequent dovish data have all made SEK more vulnerable in the near term.
Hawkish messaging was arguably the Riksbank's primary tool to support SEK, and it’s hard to see that narrative being rebuilt in June, especially if inflation continues to move in the right direction. As Floden himself admitted recently, the Riksbank may want a stronger currency, but there’s not a lot it can do about it.
More SEK weakness might push the Riksbank closer to considering FX intervention, but we have stressed multiple times how threatening intervention seems more likely to us than actually deploying this, given the relatively low ammunition in terms of reserves.
Ultimately, while the Riksbank has sought to stay out in front of the European Central Bank on rate hikes, the reality is that as the absolute level of interest rates grinds higher, the trade-offs involved for the housing market and broader economy are mounting. Policymakers will be hoping that the prospect of Federal Reserve rate cuts on the horizon, coupled with the end of the ECB’s hiking cycle over the next few months, can remove some of the pressure it's currently facing.
|