ClearBridge Investments: We can look forward to more efficient and transparent sustainable investing in 2023. Through active investment and engagement, ESG should maintain and grow its prominence in the business landscape.
It is an encouraging time for those integrating environmental, social and governance factors into the investment process, as 2022 delivered a series of firsts that should help improve that process as well as broader conversations around sustainability.
Many of these were regulatory, such as: the first year of implementation of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), which aims to improve transparency in the market for sustainable investment products and prevent greenwashing; new proposed regulations in the U.S. to update the “names rule,” the “issuer rule” and the “investor rule”, all to bolster transparency and disclosures for ESG investments; and the Department of Labor permitting retirement plan fiduciaries, such as 401(k) plan sponsors, to consider climate change and other sustainability factors when they select investment options and exercise shareholder rights, such as proxy voting for plan-held securities.
It was also the first year for managers in the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative such as ClearBridge to submit their target-setting methodologies for approval. ClearBridge shared a methodology that offers a forward-looking approach to verifying net-zero alignment that corresponds with our investment goal of identifying companies that will maintain shareholder value and be successful well into the future, as well as with our fiduciary duty.
Looking ahead, regulation will remain a key topic for sustainability-minded investors in 2023 as it begins to have a greater impact on how sustainable investing strategies are perceived and evaluated by investors. Beginning in January, Level 2 requirements of SFDR will include reporting on principal adverse impacts, though data on these remain difficult to gather, assess and compare. On a global basis, the number of regulatory initiatives jumped by 37% from 2021 to 2022, with the European region leading, and the figures are expected to keep rising going forward.
The clean energy transition will continue to dominate sustainability discussions, with the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) creating more than a decade’s worth of spending and tax credits and offering long-term visibility on climate-friendly investments across sectors. The act offers tailwinds for renewable energy, further improving its cost competitiveness, as well as electric vehicle supply chains and companies helping the climate with solutions in buildings and energy efficiency. One caveat here is that it’s important to not lose sight of company profitability and the strength of the business model: in the long term, policy tailwinds are no substitute for strong fundamentals.
The IRA also turbocharges renewable energy deployment, jumpstarts emerging technologies like battery storage, clean hydrogen and carbon capture and storage, and incentivizes U.S. manufacturing, while highlighting fair wages and the responsible production of minerals necessary for the energy transition.
Mineral production is a topic growing in importance: electrification requires large amounts of copper, for conducting electricity, and battery materials such as cobalt and lithium, for storing it. Mining these minerals entails substantial ESG risks. It is vital for clean energy storage investors to be responsibly involved in extractive industries, as we know mining can be tough on the environment. Many mines operate in emerging economies with substantial risks due to lower living standards, reduced social protections, and lax governance and environmental regulations. Extractive industries will yield many of the raw materials necessary for electrification; taking care of the land and the people on it will be paramount.
Biodiversity and human and labor rights also continue to grow as a focus, based on our company and industry engagements, in particular for companies with operations or suppliers in emerging economies, though developed market conditions need to be monitored as well. One survey of 51 institutional investors showed that biodiversity is expected to gain equal mindshare with climate change in 2023 (Exhibit 1). Biodiversity, or the variety of life on Earth and its interactions, is commonly perceived as the “less engaged environmental priority” next to climate change, and it is a fairly broad term we should be careful not to ignore.
Exhibit 1: Biodiversity Gaining in Prominence Among Institutional Investors
As of December 2022
Source: Bernstein ESG Outlook Surveys, 2022 (n=53) and 2023 (n=51).
On the human and labor rights side, more investor disclosures are being considered by the SEC and, based on 2022 proxy trends, we should expect social shareholder proposals, which increased 17% year over year in 2022,1 to continue increasing in 2023. The main driver of that increase was the 81% growth in proposals on civil rights, human rights and racial equity impact,2 though roughly half of racial audit proposals were withdrawn after companies agreed to perform some form of audit — a sign companies are starting to see the value in this type of assessment.
In 2023 we should be on the lookout for more shareholder proposals related to climate disclosure and goals, political spending disclosure, EEO-1 workplace disclosure, enhanced disclosure of diversity of the board, cybersecurity, director qualifications, and other human capital management disclosures.
In the past year, there has been a fair amount of public discussion, as well as some politically motivated action, around ESG investing, prompting some to even position themselves as “anti-ESG.” Unfortunately, in our view, some of the discussion in the U.S. focuses more on misperceptions than the underlying investment practice.
One misperception is that ESG investing is new. As practitioners of sustainable investing for 35 years, we have used a variety of names for our investment approach since we first began integrating environmental, social and governance factors into our investment analysis in 1987, including socially responsible investing (SRI), socially aware investing (SAI) and, today, ESG investment. While the term “ESG” has received a lot of attention, as has “greenwashing,” ESG investing is not a new “trend” for ClearBridge. We stayed with the term ESG after helping to coin it in 2004 with our United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative Asset Management Working Group partners, as, practically speaking, we believe every investment has environmental, social and governance risk and return implications.
Other misperceptions garnering attention involve “values” and investing. Some perceive the priority for ESG investors to be divestment from certain industries such as fossil fuels. In reality, however, only 13% of U.S.-domiciled ESG strategies actually have fossil fuel exclusions (Exhibit 2).
Exhibit 2: Asset-Weighted Percent of ESG and Exclusionary with Zero Exposure to Each Category
As of November 2022
Source: Morningstar, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Similarly, there has been a long-held assumption that ESG investors focus primarily on “values,” and in doing so create an exclusionary approach (such as excluding tobacco companies, weapons companies, etc.). But in our review of a representative U.S. stock universe, we found only 4% of the universe was excluded by such screens (the most common for U.S. ESG funds).3
Divestment from fossil fuels is one strategy for investors seeking to support the energy transition, but it is not as commonly used by ESG investors as some headlines would suggest. To complicate the story, many fossil fuel companies are adapting to support a greener future, and there is energy alpha outside the traditional energy sector, in tech and industrials, for example. As noted above, ESG investors have other investment options in energy (as a sector), such as clean and renewable energy where demand and pricing have expedited the growth trajectory. These issues deserve careful consideration from fundamental investors across the industry.
With investors, employees and other stakeholders continuing to press for climate and diversity policies and disclosures, and companies and their boards navigating increasingly complex legal and regulatory environments, ESG will remain a priority in 2023. Whether mandated by governments or initiated by companies to create long-term shareholder value, mitigate risk or respond to campaigns by investors, customers, employees and other stakeholders, we can look forward to more efficient and transparent sustainable investing in 2023. Through active investment and engagement, ESG should maintain and grow its prominence in the business landscape.
Endnotes
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please note that an investor cannot invest directly in an index. Unmanaged index returns do not reflect any fees, expenses or sales charges.
Equity securities are subject to price fluctuation and possible loss of principal. Fixed-income securities involve interest rate, credit, inflation and reinvestment risks; and possible loss of principal. As interest rates rise, the value of fixed income securities falls. International investments are subject to special risks including currency fluctuations, social, economic and political uncertainties, which could increase volatility. These risks are magnified in emerging markets. Commodities and currencies contain heightened risk that include market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions and may not be suitable for all investors.
US Treasuries are direct debt obligations issued and backed by the “full faith and credit” of the US government. The US government guarantees the principal and interest payments on US Treasuries when the securities are held to maturity. Unlike US Treasuries, debt securities issued by the federal agencies and instrumentalities and related investments may or may not be backed by the full faith and credit of the US government. Even when the US government guarantees principal and interest payments on securities, this guarantee does not apply to losses resulting from declines in the market value of these securities.
Franklin Templeton and our Specialist Investment Managers have certain environmental, sustainability and governance (ESG) goals or capabilities; however, not all strategies are managed to “ESG” oriented objectives.
Source: 2023 ESG outlook: Greater scrutiny on companies and sustainable investments | Franklin Templeton
