Advertising
Advertising
twitter
youtube
facebook
instagram
linkedin
Advertising

Taiwan, China and South Korea Are Major Players In The Chip Manufacturing Industry

Taiwan, China and South Korea Are Major Players In The Chip Manufacturing Industry| FXMAG.COM
Aa
Share
facebook
twitter
linkedin

Table of contents

  1. The United States has recently been promoting domestic semiconductor manufacturing. Can you outline for us what’s prompted this renewed activity and the importance of it?
    1. And what are some of the implications you’re paying attention to?
      1. Tapping Asia’s Chip-Making Dominance
        1. With the heightened volatility in 2022 and so much investor anxiety, where are you finding causes for optimism?
          1. Why should investors consider an allocation to South Korea and/or Taiwan, in your view?
            1. WHAT ARE THE RISKS?

          Dina Ting, Head of Global Index Portfolio Management, Franklin Templeton Exchange-Traded Funds, explores opportunities via targeted exposure to Taiwan and South Korea—two important semiconductor hubs.

          Semiconductors power our cloud-driven world, and are critical components of every electronic device, gadget or tool we use on a daily basis. Dina Ting, Head of Global Index Portfolio Management, Franklin Templeton Exchange-Traded Funds, explores opportunities via targeted exposure to Taiwan and South Korea—two important semiconductor hubs.

          The United States has recently been promoting domestic semiconductor manufacturing. Can you outline for us what’s prompted this renewed activity and the importance of it?

          President Biden made the rounds in recent weeks to support his administration’s two major economic policies—the CHIPS and Science Act and the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). He toured semiconductor chip plants in the United States, including one in the state of Michigan and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company's (TSMC) new plant in Arizona. Both policies were signed into law last summer, with the first aiming to strengthen US domestic semiconductor manufacturing, which, as of 2021, held just a 12% share of global capacity—a significant drop from about 37% in 1990.1

          In terms of importance, the inflation reduction initiative offers broad incentives to encourage investment in clean and renewable energy industries. And semiconductors are the world’s most widely traded product after automotives and oil. Globally, there are fewer than about 20 producers that can make chips at scale, with East Asia and China still dominating the vast majority of related manufacturing and production assembly. Chip manufacturing poses immense barriers to entry with enormous capital requirements and technical complexities, so that’s kept control of the industry to a few major players in Taiwan, China and South Korea. As such, many investors appreciate having the ability to access the industry through targeted single-country allocations with heavy tech-sector weighting. That way they can tap exposure to the world’s top global chip makers, while also gaining the low-cost diversification benefits of exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

          And what are some of the implications you’re paying attention to?

          With the rapid global transition away from fossil fuels and toward renewables, EV battery demand has soared. Global consulting firm McKinsey forecasts the market for battery cells to grow, on average, by more than 20% per year until 2030.2 This bodes well for South Korea’s petrochemical heavyweights, one of which is investing heavily to accelerate the sustainable expansion of its battery material production lines, including recent plans to construct a manufacturing facility for EV components in the southern United States. In terms of semiconductors, the industry’s aggregate annual growth could average 6%–8% a year, and result in a US$1 trillion-dollar industry by the end of the decade.3

          Investors pursuing access to the world’s top global semiconductor holdings may want to consider the cost-effectiveness and diversification benefits of country-focused ETFs (see exhibit 1). Such funds can be important tools for capturing exposure to indexes heavily weighted to the information technology sector, which includes the semiconductor industry.

          Tapping Asia’s Chip-Making Dominance

          Exhibit 1: Sector weights: FTSE Taiwan, South Korea and Asia ex-Japan Indexes
          As of November 30, 2022

          taiwan china and south korea are major players in the chip manufacturing industry grafika numer 1taiwan china and south korea are major players in the chip manufacturing industry grafika numer 1

           

          Source: Bloomberg. Country and regional allocations may help investors gain access to the world’s top global semiconductor (IT sector) holdings. The FTSE Global RIC Capped Indexes are market capitalization-weighted global equity indexes designed to help users meet Regulated Investment Company (RIC) concentration requirements. The indexes provide the market cap-weighted index building blocks for individual countries and regions. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest in an index. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges.

           

          With the heightened volatility in 2022 and so much investor anxiety, where are you finding causes for optimism?

          We see a bit of optimism that the bottom of the chips cycle may be near, following almost unprecedented shortages since the onset of the pandemic. Last year saw the chip squeeze turn into a glut. Last summer, stockpiles soared and consequently some leading firms have cut planned capital expenditures by as much as 50% for this year.4 At the same time, we’re fairly confident that capacity reductions today can turn into the price hikes of tomorrow—which has often been the case with such a cyclical industry. We believe that if the semiconductor inventory cycle were to peak soon, then generally speaking, the technology sector may have already reached its lows.

          Why should investors consider an allocation to South Korea and/or Taiwan, in your view?

          Besides their substantial tech-sector weights, which offer exposure to the chip industry, the FTSE South Korea and Taiwan benchmark equity indexes are up 18.2% and 9.4%, respectively for the fourth quarter of 2022.5 Broad emerging markets rose 8.0% over the same period.6 So they’ve widely outperformed most of their peers and we think attractive valuations, strong fundamentals and the positive outlook for the chips and materials industries are all critical to keep in mind. Even considering the current demand slump, we think these markets are worthy of a closer look now. Long-term supply chain realignments could benefit both economies.

          Investors have also been bargain hunting amid the general equity market downturn in 2022. TSMC in particular has come into focus recently since the United States placed new restrictions on sales of advanced semiconductors to China. The increasingly popular “China plus one” strategy could allow South Korea and Taiwan to pick up some business over the medium term.

          Both markets are export-oriented nations, which tend to benefit from weaker currencies. While US dollar strength has eased, both the South Korean won and Taiwan dollar are still significantly cheaper compared to levels seen at the start of the 2022. Both markets also hold appealing allocations to materials and industrials holdings—with their index sector weightings ranging between 6% and 13% as of the end of 2022.7 They’re home to leading, highly profitable companies with wide moats, and have built a robust ecosystem around them. Taiwanese companies, for example, command some 11% of the world’s liner fleet.8 This is a crucial advantage in times of disrupted supply chains, especially for export-heavy economies, and also given that the majority of global trade is carried by sea.

          South Korea additionally boasts impressive government blockchain initiatives, including plans for blockchain-powered networks to improve transparent food supply chains as well as another potential game-changer—new blockchain-based digital IDs to be implanted in smartphones and replace existing credentials. These IDs could potentially transform business and government efficiencies and vastly benefit South Korea’s digital economic foundation and metaverse buildout.9

          Endnotes

          1. Source: Semiconductor Industry Association, 2020.
          2. Source: “Capturing the battery value-chain opportunity.” McKinsey & Co. January 7, 2022.
          3. Source: “The semiconductor decade: A trillion-dollar industry.” McKinsey & Co, April 1, 2022. There is no assurance any estimate, forecast or projection will be realized.
          4. Source: “In ‘unprecedented’ global chip slump, SK Hynix to halve investment as recession looms.” Reuters. October 26, 2022.
          5. Source: Bloomberg, as of December 31, 2022. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results.
          6. Source: Bloomberg, as of December 31, 2022. Emerging markets represented by the FTSE Emerging Markets Index. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results.
          7. Source: FTSE Russell. December 31, 2022.
          8. Source: “Leading ship operator’s share of the world liner fleet as of October, 2022.” Statista 2022.
          9. Source: “RDA shares ‘K-agricultural tech’ with developing countries.” Korea Post. 2022.

          WHAT ARE THE RISKS?

          All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Bond prices generally move in the opposite direction of interest rates. Thus, as prices of bonds in an investment portfolio adjust to a rise in interest rates, the value of the portfolio may decline. Because municipal bonds are sensitive to interest rate movements, a municipal bond portfolio’s yield and value will fluctuate with market conditions. Changes in the credit rating of a bond, or in the credit rating or financial strength of a bond’s issuer, insurer or guarantor, may affect the bond’s value. Investments in lower-rated bonds include higher risk of default and loss of principal. Stock prices fluctuate, sometimes rapidly and dramatically, due to factors affecting individual companies, particular industries or sectors or general market conditions. Investing in the natural resources sector involves special risks, including increased susceptibility to adverse economic and regulatory developments affecting the sector. Growth stock prices may fall dramatically if the company fails to meet projections of earnings or revenue; their prices may be more volatile than other securities, particularly over the short term. Small- and mid-capitalization companies can be particularly sensitive to changing economic conditions, and their prospects for growth are less certain than those of larger, more established companies. Investments in fast-growing industries like the technology and health care sectors (which have historically been volatile) could result in increased price fluctuation, especially over the short term, due to the rapid pace of product change and development and changes in government regulation of companies emphasizing scientific or technological advancement or regulatory approval for new drugs and medical instruments.

          Special risks are associated with investing in foreign securities, including risks associated with political and economic developments, trading practices, availability of information, limited markets and currency exchange rate fluctuations and policies; investments in emerging markets involve heightened risks related to the same factors. Sovereign debt securities are subject to various risks in addition to those relating to debt securities and foreign securities generally, including, but not limited to, the risk that a governmental entity may be unwilling or unable to pay interest and repay principal on its sovereign debt. To the extent a strategy focuses on particular countries, regions, industries, sectors or types of investment from time to time, it may be subject to greater risks of adverse developments in such areas of focus than a strategy that invests in a wider variety of countries, regions, industries, sectors or investments. China may be subject to considerable degrees of economic, political and social instability.

          Investments in securities of Chinese issuers involve risks that are specific to China, including certain legal, regulatory, political and economic risks.

          Real estate securities involve special risks, such as declines in the value of real estate and increased susceptibility to adverse economic or regulatory developments affecting the sector.

          ETFs trade like stocks, fluctuate in market value and may trade above or below the ETF’s net asset value. Brokerage commissions and ETF expenses will reduce returns. ETF shares may be bought or sold throughout the day at their market price on the exchange on which they are listed. However, there can be no guarantee that an active trading market for ETF shares will be developed or maintained or that their listing will continue or remain unchanged. While the shares of ETFs are tradable on secondary markets, they may not readily trade in all market conditions and may trade at significant discounts in periods of market stress.

          Any companies and/or case studies referenced herein are used solely for illustrative purposes; any investment may or may not be currently held by any portfolio advised by Franklin Templeton. The information provided is not a recommendation or individual investment advice for any particular security, strategy, or investment product and is not an indication of the trading intent of any Franklin Templeton managed portfolio.

          Actively managed strategies could experience losses if the investment manager’s judgment about markets, interest rates or the attractiveness, relative values, liquidity or potential appreciation of particular investments made for a portfolio, proves to be incorrect. There can be no guarantee that an investment manager’s investment techniques or decisions will produce the desired results.


          Franklin Templeton

          Franklin Templeton

          The company was founded in 1947 in New York by Rupert H. Johnson, Sr., who ran a successful retail brokerage firm from an office on Wall Street. He named the company for US founding father Benjamin Franklin because Franklin epitomized the ideas of frugality and prudence when it came to saving and investing. The company's first line of mutual funds, Franklin Custodian Funds, was a series of conservatively managed equity and bond funds designed to appeal to most investors.


          Advertising
          Advertising